It is very hard to get the lighting right so that these frog’s eyes don’t look solid black. Too little flash, and they look like a vast bottomless pit … a window into the complete absence of a soul. Too much flash, and the entire thing glares over, making them look like blind zombie frogs (which also would be soulless, I suppose.)
Plants reflect a lot of infrared light. I think it’s a chlorophyll thing. So when you shoot something like grasses, you have to be careful with exposure.
For some reason, my wide angle lens flares a lot more under infrared light than under regular light. Sometimes this ruins a shot, but sometimes it adds a bit of mystery, like here.
One thing I’d like to try eventually is to use a tripod system to overlap an infrared shot with a normal light shot. For example, this could be a colour photo outside of the gateway, but only infrared within, or vice versa. I think it could be a neat (if prone to over-use) effect, but I’d need a different infrared camera to give it a try.
Because the infrared camera is only sensitive to frequencies that we can’t see, the fact that water absorbs longer wavelength light makes it nearly black. I am surprised, however, that feathers reflect infrared very similarly to visual wavelengths. I expected more of a difference there.
Another infrared photo. I’m still learning what this form can and cannot do. A lot of buildings look very interesting, and very creepy, in the infrared spectrum. As I said to a friend of mine, it’s almost like humans don’t engage in aesthetic design for spectra they can’t see. Still, you can’t deny that infrared images are very striking.
Question mark snakes follow the Coriolis effect.
In North America, they look like: ?
In South America, they look like: ¿
Near the equator, the effect is smaller and both marks are used.