This is the most common bird on the amazon. So common, in fact, that you kinda stop shooting them. Then you notice a perfect pose in the perfect light and remember that they’re actually kinda neat.
It’s interesting how cormorants queue up and then fly off in order when scared. I’m sure it’s nice from a social perspective, but it seems maladaptive from an evolutionary perspective.
In a zoo scenario, this photo would not be acceptable because of the branch that cuts across the beak. However, in the wild, you have to make due with what you get.
One of the guides mentioned that most kingfishers go blind because they hit the water with such force, over and over again, that they damage their eyes over time.
I have not yet found a ornithoptimologist to verify this fact.
Once a year, the Minnesota Zoo offers a hawk banding excursion up by Duluth. It’s a bit pricey but when you consider that it’s an all-day activity and you get to hold hawks, it’s well worth it.
I think this might be a caracara. One of the difficult things with doing this kind of photography is that, because of the movement of the boat, you have to shoot at a high shutter speed. Since the animals are moving, you need a small aperture to increase the depth of field. This helps keep it in focus if it moves too quickly as you focus. However, to shoot at high speed and small aperture, you have to boost the ISO level to where it’s unacceptably sharp … or deliberately underexpose. Underexposing works well, but when you bring it back up to being bright enough to see things, the colours are off.
Because the infrared camera is only sensitive to frequencies that we can’t see, the fact that water absorbs longer wavelength light makes it nearly black. I am surprised, however, that feathers reflect infrared very similarly to visual wavelengths. I expected more of a difference there.